The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (1569-1795)

Political System

 

By H. Kozlowski

 

 

 

The Constitution of Poland was never written. It was a body of laws sanctioned by ancient custom and subsequent legislation. By the end of Zygmunt Waza's reign it became a rigid state instrument, and underwent but few changes until the last quarter of the XVIII th century.

 

 

1. THE ELECTIONS

 

Every nobleman of Poland, Lithuania and the other parts of the Commonwealth had a right to vote. The representatives of the more important cities were members of the electorate, as were also Poland's.

 

The elections took place in a suburb of Warsaw, where the nobles and dignitaries formed two separate camps. Here the assembled electorate listened to the exhortations of the representatives of the candidates and their supporters. On the day set for the election the Senators and Representatives met with the nobility of their respective provinces and took a viva voce vote on the various candidates. Unanimous consent was necessary to make the election valid. The Primate announced the result of the election. The elected candidate, first by his representatives and then in person, swore to uphold the constitutional privileges enumerated in the pacta conventa, which the pre-election or "convocation Seym" had drawn up, whereupon a duly executed diploma of election was handed to him. He did not become, however, vested with monarchical authority until after the coronation, which took place at Cracow. The coronation ceremony was followed by a special "coronation Seym" at which the King confirmed the laws of the Commonwealth.

 

 

2. THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE KING

 

At first the King's power was considerable. The King was the supreme judge until the elective tribunals were established in Batory's time, which, however, did not supersede him in civil matters. He was commander-in-chief of the army. He could call out the national insurrection of nobles (pospolite ruszenie), but only with the consent of the Seym, of which he was an integral part.

 

He convened the national and local Seyms at times instanced by law and at other times on extraordinary occasions. He specified the matters to be submitted for the consideration of the Seym. The resolutions and acts of the Seym, as well as court decrees, were issued in his name. He had power to appoint ambassadors to foreign countries, but could give them instructions in minor matters only. The ambassadors were responsible to the Seym. Similarly, the King could confer with foreign representatives only in the presence of the Council of the Senate. The King could not go abroad, marry, or secure divorce, without the assent of the Senate. Although the King derived his power from the election, he was responsible to nobody. He was merely limited by the privileges which he granted, or which were granted by his predecessors and which he confirmed. After the extinction of the Jagiellon dynasty the electorate claimed the right to renounce allegiance to the King in case of his disregard of the law or of the articles of the covenant (de non praestanda-obedientia). The executive power of the State was vested in the King. He was, however, handicapped in the exercise of it by the life tenure of officials and by their independence. He had the sole right to appoint civil and military officers, but could not recall any officials unless guilt had been established before the Seym sitting, as a court of justice. The right of appointing bishops was vested in the King, and he had the power to donate; or mortgage crown lands.

 

 

3. OFFICES

 

All offices were life tenures. The chief offices which, with the exception of the Hetmans and the Under-Treasurer, entitled the incumbent to senatorial dignities were:

 

The Chancellor, or Keeper of the Great Seal. Both ecclesiastical and temporal nobles could hold this office. The Chancellor was the representative of the King and the interpreter of his will and intentions. He read the speeches of the Crown, presented to the Seym the matters for consideration, negotiated with foreign ambassadors and acted as intermediary between the people and the king. All royal decrees, mandates and correspondence were prepared and sign signed by him.

 

The Under-Chancellor attended to minor affairs and assumed the duties of the Chancellor in his absence. The Grand Marshall had charge of the King's safety, and was at the head of the administration of the police and judicial departments of the capital and its vicinity. His jurisdiction was very' large. Two Under-Marshalls, assisting the Grand Marshall, were also regular officials.

 

The State Treasurer had charge over the royal exchequer. He was responsible for the collection of revenue and the expenditures approved by the Seym. His reports were regularly submitted to the Seym, and for every misuse of funds he was responsible with his private fortune. He was also in charge of the mint and of the royal domains.

 


An Under-Treasurer attended to the minor matters of the office.

 

Hetmans. One Grand Hetman commanded the Crown army and another the Lithuanian army. They were charged with the duty of defending the country against invasion and of guarding the Republic against internal disturbances.

 

The Field Hetmans (also one for Crown and one for Lithuania) were a military officials of a lower rank. Their duty was to defend the frontiers of the country. They also substituted for the Grand Hetman when necessary.

 


All the above mentioned dignitaries were ministers of state

 

There were many minor state or court offices, some of which during the course of time lost their significance and were retained merely for honorary designations. Of the crown officers who discharged their duties outside of the capital, the following were the most important:

 

The "Woyevoda" was a provincial Governor. The Woyevoda led the insurrection of nobles of his province in case of war, looked after the weights and measures in towns, prescribed the prices of products, and had jurisdiction over Jews. The office entitled the holder to a seat in. the Senate.

 

The "Castellan's" was one of the offices which, like that of the Woyevoda, had a, historical tradition, but which in time proved to be a mere honorary title of the leader of the nobility of a district. In case of war he organized the citizens of the district and led them to the Woyevoda. The office gave the incumbent senatorial rank.

 

The actual executive work in the country was done by the Starostas. They enforced the decrees, and had charge over the law and order of their respective districts. They were also judges of the nobility in criminal matters. The civil jurisdiction was almost, wholly in the hands of special judges, appointed by the King from the lists of candidates presented by the nobility of the districts.

 

 

4. THE SEYM

 

The King, the Senators and the representatives of the nobles constituted the Polish Seym or Parliament. The King was an integral part of the Seym, although his constant presence during the sessions was not required. The Senate consisted of the archbishops and bishops, ministers of state, castellans and woyevodas. The high state offices created after the Senate was definitely constituted (the middle of the XVth century) did not find representation in it. That is why the Under-Treasurer and the Hetmans had no seats in the Senate. The Representatives were elected by the land seymiks, which were the legislative organs of the local autonomous government, and were bound to observe the mandates given to them.

 

There was no specified place or time for the sessions of the Seym. The king summoned it whenever occasion arose. Sometimes it met twice a year, at other times once in several years. In the XVth century the sessions lasted for a few days; in the XVIth century deliberations lasted several months. Later on the Seym met regularly every second year, and the time limit was six weeks. Extraordinary sessions could be called between the regular sessions and were to last not more than two weeks.. The "Liberum veto," whereby one deputy could dissolve a session of Seym and render nugatory all its previous decisions, came into life in the middle of the XVIIth century, in the era of moral and political decline.

 

 

5. FINANCES

 

The state revenue was derived from various duties and taxes, and from the leasing of the crown domains. The land tax was a general tax, from which only the clergy, and later the nobility also, were exempt. The products of the salt and metal mines were taxed, as were also, dwellings in the country and in the cities. The various taxes levied in the cities on commerce, transportation, manufactures and crafts, and the Jewish capitation tax were the other kinds of state revenue. The tax rate was a variable quantity; in cases of need the Seym would double, treble, and even quadruple the usual tax rate. Until the year 1717 the clergy were exempt from taxation. In extraordinary cases the Church would donate to the state treasury a "subsidium charitativum," the amount of which was fixed by the Church Council. The expenditures went for the maintenance of the King and his court, for state administration and foreign representation, and for the regular army. The collection of taxes and the disposition of the revenues were under the control of the Treasurer, responsible to the Seym. Some taxes went directly to certain officials on whose ability to collect them depended the size of their incomes; others were farmed out, and in some instances the army officers collected the taxes designated for the maintenance of the army.

 

 

6. STATUS OF VARIOUS CLASSES OF POPULATION

 

The Nobles

 

Nobles

The nobles were the ruling class with the exclusive right to enjoy full citizenship. Nobility was, hereditary in the male line, and an escutcheon was an outward sign of it. The power to ennoble resided originally in the King, but after the end of the XVIth century the approval of the Seym was required. As the class-consciousness of the nobility grew, attempts were made to restrict admission. Naturalization of foreign nobles, after 1641, similarly became a matter over which the Seym had sole control.. There were not gradation in the ranks of the nobility who guarded jealously against the rise in station of anyone by reason of hereditary title. By the act of 1638 no noble could accept or use a title, which had not been registered in the acts of the Union of Lublin in 1569. The following were the special privileges and immunities enjoyed by the nobility exclusively:

 

The right to acquire and own land in the country as well as real estate in cities, with all the wealth below the surface; The property of the nobles was exempt from confiscation without due process of law; only to the nobility was the door of the more exalted temporal and spiritual offices open;

 

They were exempt from taxation, making only such contributions as they voluntarily imposed upon themselves, with the single exception of compulsory military duty in case of war.

 

A noble was answerable only to his own courts. For killing a person not of noble rank he was punishable by a fine only. He enjoyed the right of habeas corpus; had complete freedom of speech, was an elector of the King and qualified to become a candidate for the royal office. Finally, he had a voice in the affairs of the country by electing delegates to the National Seym through the local seymiks. There was only one restriction to which the nobles had to submit, and that was the prohibition of being a merchant or an artisan. By settling in a city and engaging in this kind of work a noble forfeited all his rights to nobility.

 

 

The Clergy

 

Next to the mobility in order of enjoyment of special privileges and immunities was the Roman Catholic clergy. All the higher offices were given exclusively to persons from among the nobility, with the exception of the doctoral canons," to which only priests holding doctors degrees in theology, law and medicine could be appointed. Catholic diocesan bishops were members of the Senate. Many high state offices including that of the Chancellor, were open to the clergy. The King appointed the bishops and canons, as well as the abbots and rectors.

 

The nobility was tireless in opposing the tax exemptions of the clergy, the tithes and ecclesiastical jurisdiction. By a law of 1510 the Seym prohibited bequests of land to the Church in order to stop the tremendous growth of "the dead hand," as the Church estates were called.

 

 

The Dissidents

 

The legal guarantees of equality of rights of dissidents with Catholics were contained in the provisions of the Warsaw Confederacy of 1573, and were sworn to by every new monarch. With the growth of the Catholic reaction they became more or less a dead letter, and dissidents were made, the subjects of discrimination. No bishop of the Orthodox Church or even of the Uniate Church was recognized in the Senate, and State offices were very seldom filled by persons from among the non-Conformists. In 1632 the Seym prohibited the erection of new dissident churches in the cities of the Crown, and in 1717 this prohibition was extended to the rest of the country

 

 

The Townspeople

 

The XVI th and XVII th centuries saw the decline of the once, prosperous and powerful Polish cities. Geographical and economic conditions as well as pernicious legislation were the causes of it. Gdansk (Danzig) only, and a few other maritime cities continued to prosper. The direct interchange of the products of the manor for the foreign manufactures and luxuries, and the development of self-sufficing, communities around the manor eliminated the need of cities, and their marts and fairs. The weakness and disorganization of the cities became reflected in their relation to other elements of the population and to the Government. The cities lost their former right to home rule and representation, and were subjected to the authority of state officials and private magnates. The woyevodas prescribed prices for city products, the rates of excise taxes, etc., and the Seym established rules as to profits and even as to private expenditures and the kind of dress to be worn.

 

The townspeople did not have access to any state offices or to the higher spiritual positions. They were excluded from the national insurrection. Aside from the economic advantages the nobility planned to derive, by making themselves independent of the cities, the chief motive in destroying important and powerful cities was to remove every possibility of furnishing the King with an ally strong enough to overturn the existing order of things and to introduce absolute government in Poland.

 

The Peasants

 

Peasants

In the XVIth century there was not so much as a trace left of the independence of the peasant and his right to self-government. The laws limiting his freedom became more rigid, and the punishment for flight from the jurisdiction of his master more severe The owner of the Manor had jurisdiction over his peasants, and prescribed laws and regulations for them; he could transfer them from place to place; he could take away certain leased parcels of land and, give them others instead; he prescribed the amount of free labor the peasant had to render. There existed no state regulations as to the number of free days the peasant was obliged to give to his landlord, as to the number of beasts of burden that he had to bring with him to help in the work and as to the other duties he had to perform. In time the manor became an entirely independent economic unit. The peasant was obliged to buy all his necessities of life from the landlord and was compelled to sell all the products of his farm to the manor. The manor also established a monopoly of milling, bleaching and of spirits and beer production. The landlord compelled his peasants to purchase certain quantities of these drinks for various occasions, such as marriages and christenings. Similar conditions prevailed in church estates and crown lands, except that in crown lands the peasant had a right to appeal to the royal referee's court for redress. In spite of the loss of personal liberty, dating from 1496 in Poland and lasting longer than in the western countries of Europe, the Polish peasant was not a slave. He could not be sold and he was not, deprived of legal competence, although since 1573 he was the "peculium" of his overlord. He could hold property, both real and personal, and nobody could deprive him of it. He had hereditary rights to his land and could buy land from his landlord, to which his children had hereditary claims. His rights however, were greatly restricted; he could not leave the landlord except with his consent, or, as in some places, by forfeiting a certain sum, but by law he remained a free man.

 

 

The Jews

 

The Jews in Poland had complete autonomy in their internal affairs. In each city in which they were allowed to live there was a special Jewish college called "Kahal," which governed the Jewish affairs of the community. Every year during the great fairs at Lublin and Jaroslav the representatives of the Jews from all the provinces of Poland assembled in synods to settle the internal affairs of the various communities and inter-communal matters; also to make joint representations to the King and to apportion the taxes levied upon them as a body. In time the Jewish autonomy became weaker, and they came more under the supervision of the woyevoda and his subordinates, but they always retained their right to appeal to the King's court for redress.

 

 

 

Back to the History of Poland